제목   |  [Business] Facebook targets ‘insecure’ teens 작성일   |  2018-08-23 조회수   |  2901
첨부파일: 3992.mp3

 

                                        Facebook targets ‘insecure’ teens

 

 

                              Facebook targets ‘insecure’ teens

 

 

 

Facebook is using sophisticated algorithms to identify and exploit Australians as young as 14, by allowing advertisers to target them at their most vulnerable, including when they feel “worthless” and “insecure,” secret internal documents ­reveal.

A 23-page Facebook document seen by The Australian marked “Confidential: Internal Only” and dated 2017, outlines how the social network can target “moments when young people need a confidence boost” in pinpoint detail.

By monitoring posts, pictures, interactions and internet activity in real-time, Facebook can work out when young people feel “stressed” “defeated” “overwhelmed” “anxious” “nervous” “stupid” “silly” “useless” and a “failure,” the document states. [Such information gathered through a system dubbed sentiment analysis could be used by advertisers to target young Facebook users when they are potentially more vulnerable.]

After being contacted by The Australian, Facebook issued an apology, and said it had opened an investigation, admitting it was wrong to target young people in this way.

“We have opened an investigation to understand the process failure and improve our oversight. We will undertake disciplinary and other processes as appropriate,” a Facebook spokeswoman said in a statement sent to The Australian at the weekend.

Rumors about Facebook’s advertising sales methods have been common in media circles for several years, but until now there has been no hard evidence, nor any suggestion they go to such considerable lengths to commercialize their youngest users.

In a move that raises profound ethical questions about Facebook’s use of covert surveillance, the document lays out how the world’s biggest social network is gathering psychological insights on 6.4 million “high schoolers, college students” and “young Australians and New Zealanders … in the workforce” to sell targeted advertising.

A presentation prepared for one of Australia’s top four banks shows how the $US415 billion advertising-driven giant has built a database of Facebook users in Australlia that is made up of 1.9 million high schoolers with an average age of 16, 1.5 million university students averaging 21 years old, and 3 million young workers averaging 26 years old.

Detailed information on mood shifts among young people is “based on internal Facebook data” the document states, “shareable under non-disclosure agreement only” and “is not publicly available.”

The document was prepared by two of Facebook’s top Australian executives, David Fernandez and Andy Sinn, and includes information on when young people exhibit “nervous ­excitement” and emotions related to “conquering fears.”

The tactics appear to breach the Australian Code for Advertising & Marketing Communications to Children guidelines which seeks to maintain a high sense of social responsibility.

The code defines a child as a person 14 years old or younger, and states a “child must obtain a parent or guardian’s express consent prior to engaging in any activity that will result in the collection or disclosure of … personal information.”

Personal information is described as “information that identifies the child or could identify the child.”

The revelations cast new light on how Facebook harvests and uses the extraordinary amounts of data that it gathers on the Australian population to figure out what people are doing and thinking (for the main purpose of making money by selling the information to advertisers).

The document claims that Facebook is not only able to detect sentiment, but it can also understand how emotions are communicated at different points during a young person’s week.

“Anticipatory emotions are more likely to be expressed early in the week, while reflective emotions increase on the weekend,” the document discloses. “Monday-Thursday is about building confidence; the weekend is for broadcasting achievements.”

Extremely detailed information that is available to advertisers includes a young person’s relationship status, location, number of Facebook friends they have and how often they access the platform via mobile or desktop. Other moments in young people’s lives Facebook is seeking to sell ads against are associated with “looking good and body confidence” and “working out & losing weight.”

Facebook is also able to reap information on how users are “representing emotion and communicating visually.”

For example, using image recognition tools, advertisers can see how people visually represent moments such as meal times on the company’s platforms including Instagram, the photo-sharing site that Facebook owns.

Because Facebook rolls out ad products on a regional and global basis, the company could be targeting young children around the world with these methods.

In its statement to The Australian, Facebook refused to disclose if the practice exists elsewhere, and claims “we care deeply about the people who use our services” and“understand the importance of ensuring their safety and wellbeing.”

The Facebook statement adds: “While the data on which this research is based was aggregated and presented consistent with applicable privacy and legal protections, including the removal of any personally identifiable information, our internal process sets a standard higher than required by law.

‘‘Facebook only permits research following a rigorous procedure of review whenever sensitive data, particularly data involving young people or their emotional behavior, is involved.

“This research does not appear to have followed this process.”

The engine that drives Facebook’s opaque [unclear; hard to understand] ad sales system is built on algorithms — sets of complex instructions that Facebook’s engineers use to mine personal information about the preferences of a worldwide audience of 1.86 billion users.

 

 

 

Article Source:https://www.studentnewsdaily.com/daily-news-article/facebook-targets-insecure-teens/

ImageSource: "https://www.studentnewsdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/mark-zuckerberg-820x587.jpg" class="img-thumbnail" alt="Facebook targets ‘insecure’ teens

 

 

 

VOCABULARY WORDS

 

1.Sophisticated/adjective: having, revealing, or proceeding from a great deal of worldly experience and knowledge of fashion and culture.

2.Exploit/verb: make full use of and derive benefit from (a resource).

3.Reveal1/verb: make (previously unknown or secret information) known to others.

4.Overwhelm/verb: bury or drown beneath a huge mass.

5.Anxious/adjective: experiencing worry, unease, or nervousness, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome.

6.Vulnerable/adjective: susceptible to physical or emotional attack or harm.

7.Oversight/noun: an unintentional failure to notice or do something.

8.Ethical/adjective: relating to moral principles or the branch of knowledge dealing with these.

9.Shareable/adjective: suitable or intended for sharing with another or others.

10.Revelation/noun: a surprising and previously unknown fact, especially one that is made known in a dramatic way.

11.Algorithm/noun: a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer.

12.Preference/noun: a greater liking for one alternative over another or others.

13.Anticipatory/adjective: happening, performed, or felt in anticipation of something.

14.Reflective/adjective: providing a reflection; capable of reflecting light or other radiation.

 

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

 

1. What did secret Facebook documents reveal about the company’s program targeting Australian young people? Be specific.
b) What do the Facebook documents reveal about the company? (see paragraph 14)

2. How did Facebook gather the information about the emotions of younger users?

3. Why is the company gathering this detailed personal information on its younger users?

4. What information does Facebook provide to its advertisers from this secret information gathering? — How does Facebook use the information it secretly gains from teens? (see para. 17-19)

5. a) Describe Facebook’s response to The Australian news.
b) What do you think the company means when it says they will “undertake disciplinary and other processes”?
c) Should users who had personal / emotional details sold to advertisers be satisfied with Facebook’s response? Explain your answer.

6. a) Do you think Facebook gathers the same information about American users that it does about Australian teen users? Explain your answer.
b) Why is the 14-26 age group so important/lucrative to Facebook?

7. Read the following from an news .com.au article on the same story that is included in “Background” below the questions:

Mark Zuckerberg’s company has not been shy about exploring ways it can manipulate the data it collects on users.

For one week in 2012, Facebook ran an experiment on some of its users in which it altered the algorithms it used determine which status updates appeared in the news feed of nearly 700,000 randomly selected users based on the post’s emotional content.

Posts were determined to be either negative or positive and Facebook wanted to see if it could make the selected group sad by showing them more negative posts in their feed. It deemed it could.

The results were published in a scientific journal but Facebook was criticized by those concerned about the potential of the company to engage in social engineering for commercial benefit.

Currently information about your relationship status, location, age, number of friends and the manner and frequency with which you access the site is sold to advertisers. But according to the report, Facebook is also seeking to sell ads to users concerned with insights gleaned from posts such as those concerned with body confidence and losing weight.

a) What is your initial reaction to this information?

b) One reader wrote: “Don’t be fooled. These companies exist only to make billions of dollars for their founders and shareholders. They claim to be do-gooders and while they support some good causes to make themselves feel good about being multi-billionaires, it is at the expense not only of your privacy, but manipulating your thoughts and emotions for their own purposes.”
Do you agree or disagree with this assertion? Explain your answer.

인쇄하기